Quantcast SDSU Collegian
College Media Network

Legislators look to ban texting while driving

Legislative bills could make changes to campus and affect state liquor laws.

Vanessa Marcano

Issue date: 2/3/10 Section: News
  • Print
  • Email
The 2010 85th session of the South Dakota Legislative assembly began on Jan. 12, sparking discussions over several issues that will affect South Dakotans and SDSU in various ways.

House Bills 1025, 1026 and 1027 deal with future constructions occurring at SDSU. HB 1025 would authorize the Board of Regents to construct a motor pool building on campus, while HB 1026 would give the green light for phase II of the Electrical Engineering and Computer Science building. Both bills have been referred to the House Appropriations committee for further discussion and any possible amendments.

HB 1027, which allows for the construction of a visitor center in McCrory Gardens, was heard and amended twice on Jan. 28. On Feb. 2, HB 1027 was deferred to another day.

On Jan. 28, the House read HB 1156, which would provide health insurance coverage for contraceptive drugs and devices. HB 1156 states that "no policy of group health insurance … may exclude or restrict" benefits for contraceptive devices or drugs approved by the Federal Drug Administration. HB 1156 would also ban health insurance providers from denying eligibility based on current or potential use of contraceptives or penalize or limit reimbursement of a health care professional for prescribing contraceptives, among other provisions in the bill. HB 1156 is currently at the House Commerce Committee.

On Jan. 27, HB 1144 was read and referred to the House Affairs Committee. HB 1144 seeks to revise the Human Relations Act to include additional categories of persons, to include protection against discrimination based on age, veteran status, sexual orientation or gender identity.

Sponsored by Rep. Deb Peters, HB 1144 "adds age, sexual orientation, gender identity and veteran or military status to the classes of persons protected from discrimination under S.D.'s human rights laws," according to the Madville Times alternative community news blog.

HB 1178, which would ban the use of certain wireless communications devices while driving, was read and referred to the House State Affairs Committee on Jan. 28. The bill defines wireless communications device as a "hand-held cellular phone or a portable electronic device that is capable of receiving and transmitting data, including text messages and e-mail", but excludes devices that are affixed on the car, such as a GPS, if it is only used for navigation. HB 1178 would make it a "careless driving" class 2 misdemeanor to drive on a highway while "using a wireless communications device to compose, read or send an electronic message."
Page 1 of 2 next >

Article Tools

The Collegian is not responsible for any comments made by contributors below.
However, The Collegian will exercise its right to moderate and edit comments which are deemed to be offensive or unsuited to the subject matter of this site.

Be the first to comment on this story

  • NOTE: Email address will not be published

Type your comment below (html not allowed)

  I understand posting spam or other comments that are unrelated to this article will cause my comment to be flagged for deletion and possibly cause my IP address to be permanently banned from this server.

Advertisement

Poll

Do you think the university notified students of the assaults in an efficient way?
Submit Vote

View Results

Advertisement